The Nanda Devi Nuclear Device: Facts, Myths, and Environmental Concerns
In recent years, social media posts and screenshots—often attributed to The New York Times—have claimed that a secret nuclear generator is hidden inside Himalayan glaciers supplying water to the Ganges and Yamuna rivers, posing a massive radioactive threat. While this story is based on a real Cold War incident, many circulating claims are exaggerated or scientifically incorrect. Understanding the actual facts is essential.
The Real Incident: Nanda Devi Mission (1965–1968)
During the Cold War, the United States and India cooperated on a covert intelligence mission to monitor Chinese nuclear and missile tests. The target site was Nanda Devi, one of India’s highest and most remote Himalayan peaks.
The device involved was not a nuclear generator or reactor, but a Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator (RTG), commonly used in space missions and remote monitoring equipment.
Key facts:
Device name: SNAP-19C (sometimes confused with SNAP-27)
Power source: Plutonium-238, not “radioactive platinum”
Purpose: Power a surveillance sensor
Year: First attempted installation in 1965
Partners: CIA (USA) and Indian intelligence, with Indian and American mountaineers
What Went Wrong?
In 1965, due to a sudden and severe snowstorm, the climbing team was forced to abandon the mission. The RTG device was temporarily secured on the mountain with plans to retrieve it later.
When the team returned the following year, the device was missing, likely swept away by an avalanche into a deep crevasse or buried under ice and rock.
Subsequent missions did not recover the device.
Common Myths vs Scientific Reality
❌ Myth 1: “A nuclear generator is hidden in glaciers”
✔ Reality: It was a small RTG, not a reactor or power plant.
❌ Myth 2: “Radioactive platinum is leaking into rivers”
✔ Reality:
The fuel was Plutonium-238, not platinum-238 or platinum-239.
Plutonium-238 is used in solid ceramic form and does not dissolve easily in water.
❌ Myth 3: “It can cause mass poisoning of the Ganges”
✔ Reality:
Studies and monitoring over decades have found no measurable radioactive contamination in the Ganges linked to this device.
The Ganges’ vast water volume would dilute any hypothetical release to near-undetectable levels.
Environmental & Safety Assessment
Plutonium-238 half-life: ~87.7 years
Encased in multiple protective layers
No verified evidence of radiation spikes in downstream regions
Indian authorities later banned nuclear-related activities in the Nanda Devi region, turning it into a protected biosphere
While scientists agree that any lost radioactive material is undesirable, they also agree that the risk is extremely low, even with glacier melt.
What Did The New York Times Actually Report?
The New York Times and other reputable outlets reported on:
The existence of the Cold War mission
The loss of an RTG device
Concerns expressed at the time
However, claims about an active nuclear generator, radioactive rivers, or “dirty bomb potential” are speculative and often misrepresented in viral posts.
Conclusion
The Nanda Devi incident is a real historical event, not a conspiracy—but it is often distorted online.
There is no nuclear reactor in the Himalayas
There is no confirmed radiation threat to the Ganges or Yamuna
The incident reflects Cold War secrecy, not an ongoing environmental disaster
Responsible discussion should rely on verified science, historical records, and expert assessments, not sensationalized claims.
.jpeg)
